A write up about connecting
a ballast to the fluorescent lamps.
email:
website: http://www.siongboon.com
Topic Discussion Overview
| 1. Magnetic &
Electronic Ballast Compare |
Electronic ballast used to be
expensive; something relatively new. Today, we can get them at a very
reasonable price. In long run, it is cheaper to use a electronic
ballast than a magnetic one. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Circular
Flourescent using Magnetic Ballast and Starter |
Circular
Flourescent using Electronic Ballast |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
My old fluorescent lamp installation. Video: MVI_6953.avi (see how the lamp flicker upon switched on, and the flickering after switching on) |
My new installation using the
electronic ballast (model: EBCFL-001) from saveOne. The
fluorescent lamp and the AC wiring remains the same. Old ballast and
starter are removed, and replaced with the electronic ballast. The
ballast is very light and is able to plug onto the circular fluorescent
lamp easily.
Video: MVI_6954.avi (see how fast and stable the lamp's light is. It is amazing.) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() (Click image for larger view) |
![]() (Click image for larger view) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Magnetic Ballast Schematic (Click image for larger view) |
![]() Electronic Ballast Schematic (Click image for larger view) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The magnetic ballast is simply a inductor core structure, limiting the amount of current to the fluorescent lamp. The video clearly demostrates the starter assisting the fluorescent lamp to start up. A lot of flickering is observed during the initial switched on. Flickering can also be observed during the steady state; after the initial start up. The steady state flickering is mainly contributed from the 50Hz in the 230Vac power supply. My camera is able to detect the 50Hz, hance the flicking. |
Some reference on how a fluorescent light can affect human eye http://www.ehow.com/about_6531222_effect-fluorescent-light-human-eyes_.html http://www.cclvi.org/contributions/effects2.htm http://www.naasln.org/documents/articles/kitchel_fluorescent_light.pdf
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
My old ballast with the starter & it's holder. The ballast is made of copper coil and steel plate, therefore there is quite some heavy. The setup generate significant heat during operation. The heat causes the surrounding plastic parts to become very brittle after a very long period of use. Therefore you need to be careful when securing the wire. The old plastic might just shuttled into sandy particles; the metal parts covered by the plastic will be exposed. Remember to tape the exposed metal parts. |
click here for product brochure.
Address: Block 22 Havelock Road, #01-681, Singapore 160022 http://www.amngv.blogspot.com/ http://www.alibaba.com/product/sg111053150-112347087-101831034/Electronic_Ballast.html http://www.asianmicrongv.com/promotion3.html
The electronic ballast is much more lighter than my old ballast. It is make up of electronics circuit board; driving the fluorescent lamp. The company claims that it is energy saving; having a power factor of 0.95. Unlike the magnetic ballast, electronic ballast would be of a less inductive load nature. The electronic ballast having a better power factor, draws less current. The reduce in current flow also results in higher efficiency and less heat generated. The product also claims to have brighter luminence. From naked eye, I can hardly see any difference in the lamp brightness. I may get the lux difference if I measure it with a lux meter, but this does not bother me much. This electronic ballast is still a great choice with it's many other benefits. They also have the electronic version to replace my 2 pin compact flourescent lamp (PL lamp). The 2 pin PL lamp also requires a magnetic ballast connecting in series to it. You may not notice any starter required for your PL lamp; in fact the starter has been built into the PL lamp tube. This means that if your fluorescent or starter is not working, you got to replace your whole PL lamp. Notice how the PL lamp flicker when it is turned on; it is the starter inside the lamp. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Advantage - high reliability - still adopted widely among the population, therefore it is currently cheaper in cost. Disadvantage - lamp flicker when it get switched on. - need a starter component. - lamp and starter need frequent replacement. (more wear and tear) - heat generated by the magnetic ballast - might virbate and generate a humming sound. - generate noise when switching on/off which will disturb other electronics appliances. - heavy. - fluorescent cannot be dimmed. Updated as of Date: 03 Sep 2010 |
Advantage
Disadvantage |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. Electronic Ballast
Testing & Measurement Setup done to measure the lighting intensity (LUX) I
have received a few feedbacks from friends after installing for them
this electronics ballast. They mention that the lighting intensity
seems lower than their old magnetic ballast. This is very different
from the observation that I had; my observation was that both ballast
does not have any noticeable difference in brightness. The light
intensity that our eye sees is non-linear and is rather subjective.
Non-linear means that in order for our eyes to perceive a double in
lighting intensity, the actual intensity will have to be much more than
a double. This motivates me to do a brightness measurement test, which
is also an opportunity to verify the manufacturer's claim of their
ballast being able to increase the lamp's brightness. This will also
conclude the perception of my friends and myself. The light intensity
LUX meter will be our best judge to provide us the answer that I am
looking for. Updated as of Date: 01 Oct 2010
I happen to read some article about electronic ballast controlled fluorescent. The fluorescent tube takes some time to warm up and reach it's full brightness. The follow are some article that I found: - http://www.nscave.com/Reviews/florescent%20overheat.htm
Updated as of Date: 17 Apr 2011
|
Meter reads 160 Lux at a distance of 1450mm. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Measurement results for my grandmother's house Living Room Setup Measurement was done at about 85cm below the center of the lamp. The lamp size was diameter 406mm The magnetic ballast gave off brighter lights 470 lux, with the AC current reading of 0.357A. After changing to the
electronic ballast the illuminance was reduce to 284 lux, with the AC
current readin of 0.110A. The lux drops about a third from the magnetic
ballast (reduce), but the current was 3 times much more lower.
This means that the current flowing through the cable was much lesser given the amount of illuminance. The same cable is able to carry 3 times more number of lamps. It might translate to lower energy consumed (please read measurement results). If we compute the illuminance efficiency over the amount of current flow. Magnetic ballast (lux/amphere) = 470 lux / 0.357A = 1316.53 lux/A Electronic ballast (lux/amphere) = 284 lux / 0.110A = 2581.82 lux/A The efficiency is double in the area of current carrying. This is expected, since a magnetic is inductive in nature. For energy efficiency, it would be measured differently. (see the result interpretation on the measured current) The following section presents the summary of the results and also a detail interpretation. Updated as of Date: 03 Oct 2010 |
Dining Area Setup Measurement was done at about
85cm below the center of the lamp. The lamp size was 299mm.
The magnetic ballast gave a measurement of 309 lux, with the AC current reading of 0.458A. There are burn mark found near the tube's end; it must be quite an old lamp. The electronic ballast gave a
measurement of 197 lux, with the AC current
reading of 0.090A. illuminance is also about a third lower while
current flow was 5 times lower.
Compute illuminance efficiency over the amount of current flow. Magnetic ballast (lux/amphere) = 309 lux / 0.458A = 674.67 lux/A Electronic ballast (lux/amphere) = 197 lux / 0.090A = 2188.89 lux/A The efficiency is more than 3 times. That was a lot more different than the measurement done for the living room. Perhaps it was the old lamp that cause the difference. For all the measurement done for the 299mm diameter lamp, the current reading were almost constant at 0.09A. (please check up the following section on the results) The electronic ballast is about the regulate a constant current for all the lamps. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary of the measurement results The following were the
lightings intensity (LUX) and current (A)
results taken from various rooms during the day time. The first row
shows the result from a
magnetic ballast and the second row the result after replacing it with
an electronic ballast.
The results were rather consistent, telling the same story as mentioned above. The first column "LUX (Lamp switched off)" is for nulling purposes. The room/environment lighting condition had to be taken as a reference before the actual lighting intensity was taken. The outdoor sunlight is likely to contribute to the reading especially if the measuring meter is place near the window. Light intensity from the sun can change quite quickly, considering the unpredictable cloud movement blocking the sunlight. Another reference is necessary for the electronic ballast installation because the outside intensity might have changed during the change-over period. The second column "LUX (850mm below the lamp)" is the intensity reading when the lamp is switched on. The reading includes lighting intensity contributed from nearby light sources. The thrid column "Effective LUX" is the result from the second column minus the first column. This should take away the LUX reading resulted from other light sources; the remaining will be the actual LUX reading from our lamp of interest. The reading various from lamp to lamp. They were closely related to the lamp in use during the experiments. Old lamps has a lower LUX reading. New lamps has a higher LUX. This was verify during the test against new and old lamps in the coming next section. The last column "Current" indicates the amount of current flowing through the cable. It might not represent the amount of energy consumed. The energy being consumed is represented by the real power, which can be measured by a power meter. I did not had this equipment, and was unable to do the test. Low current readings indicates that a smaller diameter cable can be use to carry the power. This means that you could carry more loads on the same cable, or using a thinner cable to deliver the power to your load; all these can translate to lower cost. Inductive or capacitive load will have imaginary + real power supplied to it. This imaginary power results in the additional AC current flow (charge & discharge the load), hence a thicker cable is required. Loads that indicate a power factor of 1.0 means that they are drawing 100% real power. Anything thing less than 1.0 indicates the imaginary components. The lower the load's power factor, the more the current will be needed to flow through the cable. Hence, a low power factor is an indication of poor efficiency. Our service provider (Power Station) will always try to balance the load so that a near power factor of 1.0 can be achieve. This will make the best use of the power transmission cable. Updated as of Date: 03 Oct 2010 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lighting Intensity comparison with old & new lamps The electronic ballast mounted
for the dining area. Old and new lamps were tested for a comparison.
The reading was taken during the night time, therefore the nulling LUX
value (contributed from other lighting source) remains the same.
The electronic ballast product results in a lower intensity of light. The low illuminance is also closely related to the condition of the lamp. As shown in the results on the right after changing to a new lamp, the current flow remains the same while the brightness was increase by double. It was definately a lamp problem. To compare the new/old lamp theory even further, I had done another test in Room 2. This time, I am comparing all the measurements against new/old lamps as well as magnetic/electronic ballast. Magnetic ballast lighting intensity is much higher, at the expenses of higher current flow. The new lamp was not only brighter, but it also results in lower current flow than the old lamp. This was unlike the electronic ballast where the current flow was almost constant irregardless if it was an old or new lamp. Updated as of Date: 03 Oct 2010 |
The LUX reading after replacing it with the new lamp was even higher than the magnetic ballast fixing that was measured in the day time! The best part was that the current remains the same. Increase in brightness without spending more energy. This shows that the LUX reading is quite closely related to the condition of the lamp.
From the experiment for Room 2, it shown that new lamps can emit more lights yet using less current. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conclussion The results were quite clear
and consistent. I had also done the same measurement in my friend's
house before doing the setup as shown above. Their feedback was indeed
true as shown in this experiment.
Replacing the ballast with the electronic version from saveOne does improve the efficiency, but at the expenses of a slightly lower illuminance. With the well regulated current from the electronic ballast, I will expect the life-span of the lamp to be longer. For new lamps using the saveOne electronic ballast, the lowered illuminance was not noticable; for old lamps the brightness change was noticable. It is recommended to change your lamp to a new one, when switching from magnetic ballast to an electronic ballast. The experiment still lacks the test on energy efficiency. I will need a portable power meter in order to do this test. I have to do it another time. Updated as of Date: 03 Oct 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Measurement I have managed to got hold of a power meter to do some measurement. Energy efficiently using Electronic ballast (lux/watt) = 145 lux / 27.8W = 5.22 lux/W Magnetic ballast (lux/watt) = 207 lux / 46W = 4.50 lux/W The efficiency using the saveOne electronic ballast was better than the magnetic ballast but it was not as good as what I had expected. It was about 16% improvement. However, the current was reduce by 52%. The power wattage was reduced by 40%. The reduced in power consumption results in lower Lux but has increase the efficiency of the lightings. The lower current helps to keep the cable size lean, which may results in lower infrastructure cost. The next experiment I am looking forward would be to test various electronic ballast, to compare their performance. Updated as of Date: 06 Oct 2010 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. Electronic
Ballast are Common On
the right, are some photos of our current fluorescent lamps that we
have outside our Singapore HDB flats. This is the fluorescent lamp that
was
replaced during the Aug 2005 period. If I am not wrong, all the
Singapore HDB flats had been changed with this same with electronic
ballast lamp fittings. I could still remember it because I
was working as a temperory staff with a lighting company. We were
assembling
these lamps in-house, preparing for the on-site installation. You can
also watch the following video. The lightings were not flicking when
captured on my camera. If you noticed carefully, there were no starter.
The new installation makes sense because it will significantly reduces HDB maintenence cost and work. Each HDB flat (12 storey) has about 100 lamps, and the whole town of flats. Imagine the kind of maintenence that has to be done. It make sense to install the electronic ballast, which is why commercial buildings/offices are usually installed with the electronics version. The strange thing was that most HDB home were still using the magnetic ballast. Perhaps the lower material cost was the reason behind most home funishing contractor's choice. I am quite bias against the general contractor; there were a number of incident that I had with them in my work. They had the mentality of using cheaper material at the expenses of their customer to gain more profit. Always seek alternative opinons when it comes to engineering solutions. Althrough this lamp design looks very simple to most of us, it was one of the most efficient lamp design I had seen so far. I was quite sensitive to the reflector design during that time, because lightings design was part of my work in my previous job. I was working on a security imaging equipment. The lamp itself has no cover, which was something good. The cover can block a significant amount of light; the attenuation could be as high as 50% or more; even if the cover is clear, see through. I like the reflector design for this HDB lamp. The reflector was one of the most efficient reflector that I ever seen for the fluorescent tube. The reflector has a sharp bended on the center (which is block by the tube) and formed a curved shape down to both sides. This shape can deflect the backward direction light energy, back to the front. The reflector surface was coated with matt white paint, which is an excellent surface to disperse the lights evenly in all the direction. If you look at the photo with the lights on, you can hardly see the fluorescent tube itself. The reflector has done a good job. When I first started designing the reflector, I had this myth that a reflector need to be a shining surface; I think most of us will think the same. This was what my company were doing. If you notice the old reflector design, they were made of stainless steel with mirror surface finishing; I could still see it on today's lamp too. This type of reflector will not be able to lit up your room as evenly and as bright as the one with a matt white surface. The result would be a room that seems not bright enough. Unless you want to focus the lighting source to a location, you should use a reflector with matt white surface. Those in the field of interior design/art/photography will understand it better. I actually got to learn about this through the internet. I was very shock and surprised when I first learned about it. Reference: Energy Audit of selected HDB residential blocks in Singapore Aug 2004.pdf Updated as of Date: 25 Sep 2010 |
(Click image for larger view) ![]() (Click image for larger view) ![]() Watch the video >> |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4. Electronic
Ballast Circuits |
- AN1501 Simple Microcontrolled Ballast.pdf - AN1543 Electronic Lamp Ballast Design.pdf - electronic fluorescent lamp ballast, st application notes.pdf ![]() - 12V operated electronic ballast fluorescent lamp, from website http://www.repairfaq.org/sam/schfil.htm (Click image for larger view) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reference:
- http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Fluorescent_lamp
- The ABC of electronic ballast (from Philips), ABC of
electronic fluorescent ballast.pdf
- Ballasts for
Fluorescent Lamps.pdf, (from NLPIP National Lighting Product
Infomation Program)
- http://www.sizes.com/home/fluorescents.htm
- Electronic
ballast report, SREB2.pdf
- flicker or humming, http://home.howstuffworks.com/fluorescent-lamp6.htm
- electronic ballast advantages, http://www.eballast.com/ballast_savings.aspx
- Metal Halide Ballasts, http://www.bchydro.com/powersmart/technology_tips/buying_guides/lighting/metal_halide_ballasts.html
- Electronic and Digital Ballasts from HID Hut, http://www.hidhut.com/catalog/digital-ballasts-c-21.html
- Fluorescent Dimming, http://www.etcconnect.com/Community/wikis/products/fluorescent-dimming.aspx
- Compact Fluorescent Lamps, http://www.energysavers.gov/your_home/lighting_daylighting/index.cfm/mytopic=12050
- The Impact of Electronic Ballast on Fluorescent Lamps, http://www.bestproducts.com.hk/en-gb/light/eb/electronic_ballast.htm
- T12-Magnetic to T8-Electronic Ballast/light, http://reviews.ebay.com/T12-Magnetic-to-T8-Electronic-Ballast-light_W0QQugidZ10000000007691483
- T8 Fluorescent Lamps and Electronic Ballasts, http://www.mge.com/business/saving/detail/t8.htm
- Fluorescent Ballasts, http://www.lightsearch.com/resources/lightguides/ballasts.html
- FUTURE BRITE ELECTRONIC BALLASTS vs. MAGNETIC, http://www.planetnatural.com/site/xdpy/kb/future-brite-ballasts.html
- Don’t get your fingers burnt: The truth about
electronic ballasts, http://www.maxigrow.com/Resource/Downloads/Dont_get_your_fingers_burnt_The_truth_about_electronic_ballasts.pdf
- These ballasts convert the incoming power to an output frequency in excess of 20 kHz. This increases lamp efficiency. http://www.answers.com/topic/fluorescent-lamp#ixzz1LlxlSTRV
Topic/Questions for further research:
- ballast affects fluorescent lamp brightness
- fluorescent lamp compare to LED lighting power consumption
- electronic ballast produce less heat
- lightings
without cover. lightings intensity.
Keyword: electronic ballast, magnetic ballast comparison, energy
saving, long lasting fluorescent
lamps, starter.